Tehran is willing to resume nuclear negotiations with Washington as long as it is handled with "dignity" and "respect", Iran's top diplomat has declared.
Abbas Araghchi declared solely negotiations produced results, and disclosed new appeals had been made by mediators to restart discussions with the Trump administration. He claimed Iran had zero undeclared nuclear sites, and Tehran had not yet reached a point to authorize the global atomic watchdog to visit bombed nuclear sites for protective measures.
The foreign minister is navigating a difficult course since Iran aims to avoid appear to be operating from a position of disadvantage, and he insisted repeatedly that Iran had arisen more resilient in military terms and psychologically from the coordinated strike on its enrichment centers in June.
He was speaking at a security conference in Tehran where he reiterated that Iran had "an inalienable right to process nuclear material within its borders that it will perpetually retain" – the primary cause of the stalemate in the prior discussions.
The previous five rounds of negotiations between the US and Iran were concluded unexpectedly and hostile termination on 12 June when Israel, with American backing, struck Iran's enrichment centers in a 12-day war that concluded with the US president claiming the facilities had been eliminated. Subsequently, Western states employed their right to reimpose global restrictions, but Iran maintains they have not had a substantial consequence.
Iran's diplomats said they felt they had attained a "perfect agreement" to the uranium processing matter in prior discussions, when it was decided an Iran-based consortium with American involvement could process nuclear material. Each party would have been able to assert triumph since domestic enrichment would have continued and the US could be assured that Iran's nuclear programme was entirely non-military.
It had not been decided in the talks that US nuclear scientists could operate within Iranian territory, but that was a reasonable assumption of the cooperative offer. Diplomats asserted repeatedly they had secured an understanding with Trump's special envoy the US official only for the arrangement to fall apart due to "spoilers in Washington".
Iran's diplomats declared the partnership proposal was now no longer available, but it seems very probable the suggestion could be reintroduced in certain ways if talks restart.
Trump last week said he had been obtaining communications that Iran wanted to reopen negotiations, but confidentially Tehran representatives say they are not yet obtaining coherent offers from the United States either straightforwardly or from important Middle Eastern intermediaries, such as the Qatari government, Egypt, the Omani authorities and Saudi Arabia. The Tehran's diplomatic corps has been charged of inactivity in the aftermath of the US president's straightforward manner, but Iran asserts diplomacy is not part of a spectacle.
In his remarks to the gathering, intended to depict the US as a dominant force that abuses the notion of international law, Araghchi said the 12-day war showed the conflict could not be resolved by combat operations. He stated the attacks commenced with a American requirement for an unconditional Iranian surrender and ended with an absolute demand for a halt to hostilities.
Iran is assured the initial Israeli attacks were carried out with complete American awareness and cooperation, making faith difficult to rebuild.
The foreign minister said: "Tehran was not the one that had fled negotiations; it was the United States and the Western nations that had repeatedly tried to impose their will during the discussions. Dialogue can still be viable and continues the final resolution to settle conflicts, but its standards, rules and tenets must be respected."
"In case they speak to the nation of Iran with the tone of respect and respect, they will get a reply in the equivalent language."
In what is characterized by Iranian officials as the battle of recovery and reconstruction, Araghchi said he was certain Iran's security strengths "have significantly improved than preceding 13 or 14 June of this year. All our capabilities have been rebuilt. We learned numerous insights from this conflict; we have identified our own weaknesses and the vulnerabilities of the enemy."
He added: "We effectively endured this engagement. Our nuclear technology, which they planned to destroy, stays intact. The installations and machinery, if eliminated, will be reconstructed; what is important is the resolve of the Iranian people and then the unity of the country that they aimed at, but were unable to destroy. The Iranian people have developed more powerful, more integrated, and more backing of the government and the state in the wake of this assault."
A seasoned mountaineer and travel writer with over a decade of experience exploring remote peaks and sharing practical insights for adventurers.